Friday, 7 March 2008

Acoustic Ladyland Kathy Shaidle Unplugged

Acoustic Ladyland Kathy Shaidle Unplugged
Kathy Shaidle
Lulu Press

Digital Delivery

I first discovered Kathy Shaidle through her original blog relapsedcatholic.com which had a seven year run; now she blogs at www.fivefeetoffury.com. Kathy was one of the original
bloggers writing on politics, religion and Canadian pop culture. After encountering her blog, I tracked down all of her books and devoured them, and have read each many times. So this new offering was much anticipated and eagerly expected. Yet, Kathy being Kathy is on the forefront yet again. This book is only available through digital delivery. That way, the author not the publisher makes the money. Smart girl that Kathy.

To be honest, at first I was disappointed with this book. I have been waiting for a new book from Kathy Shaidle for a few years now. I have even emailed and asked her when one would be forthcoming. Then when one comes along I pay for it and download it, and it is only 61 pages
long. I was so disappointed that it was so small that I put off reading it. However my curiosity got the better of me and I finally caved and began to read. After all, having read nearly 30 of her columns from the Toronto Star and some posts from her award winning blog, it had to be worth a look.

Shaidle often amazes me with her wordcraft, and her ability to pack so much punch into small columns, articles or blog posts, and she considers this some of her best. The first offering is 'How I learned to stop worrying and left the Left' is Kathy at her best. She exposes her past and is vulnerable and transparent in a terribly funny and charming way. This is also shown in her entry 'Being an American trapped in a Canadian's body'. Then we have a piece called 'The Canonization of Pat Lowther' which takes to task The Canadian Literary industry, and who they honour and ignore. In a great piece called 'Don't trust anyone over fifty' she tackles the issue of truth, and truth in higher education. It makes one wonder what she would say about comparisons made between JK Rowling to Tolkien or Lewis.

My favourite piece is called 'Things to do when you're dead'. Shaidle writes often about death but the humour, wit and wisdom in this piece reminds me of my own sensibilities. This piece will either make you want to laugh or to cry but it will evoke a response.

An intriguing article entitled 'At the Self-Pity Spa I Sat Down and Wept' takes us to the core of Shaidle's self and her humanity. Then with a mix of articles about porno websites, religious websites, Failed Priests, Jackie Kennedy Onasis, and many more, there is something to grab every reader's attention. Shaidle is famous or infamous for drawing and tying pop culture and religious references together, and these pieces highlight some of the best of each. The final piece 'What I Learned in Catholic School' will resonate with Catholic women and those who know them.

So try a book in digital delivery and save a tree. You won't regret it. The ebook can be purchased from www.lulu.com/content/1762097. My only disappointment is that it was not longer.

(First Published in Imprint 2008-03-07.)


Books by Kathy Shaidle:
gas station of the cross (1990)
Round Up The Usual Suspects: More poems about famous dead people (1992)
Lobotomy Magnificat (1997)
God Rides a Yamaha (1998)
A Seeker's Dozen: The 12 Steps for Everyone Else (2004)
A Catholic Alphabet: The Faith from A to Z (2005)
Acoustic Ladyland: Kathy Shaidle Unplugged (2007)
The Tyranny of Nice (2009 with Pete Vere)

Confessions of A Failed Slut (2014)

Author Profile Kathy Shidle Interview (2011)
Author Profile (2006)


Other Posts and Links:

Kathy Shaidle's Blog
More Books That Will Change Your Life

Some Old Stuff Some New
Trends: Female Authors
Meme Booked by 3 - December
Meme - A fun Book Meme



Wednesday, 5 March 2008

Religion and the World Today! An Essay.

Religion and the World Today!

"What is Religion?" is a question that is not easy to answer. For I believe that every theologian, every religious thinker, and I would go so far as to say every member of a faith community, would have their own definition of 'Religion'. Then to combine a debate on religion's importance in the today's world, and attitudes towards the usage of the Old Testament to the question would be an exercise that could easily span many volumes of books, let alone a short essay. Yet with that limitation in mind, I will attempt to do some small justice to each.

First of all, I must state that all that I see and do is done through the filter of my mind and my experiences, my temperament and sometimes with 'blinders' on. I see this world and all things in it, from a white, Celtic, male perspective; one who is a believer and a member of a faith community. I also freely admit that there are strengths and weaknesses in my heritage and worldview. With this in mind, I will begin.

To use the term 'religion' is limiting in both good and bad ways. It is bad in view of the fact that it is often perceived as being traditionalistic, conservative and oppressive. It is good when you view the fact that it gives guidelines, form and structure to both an individual's and a community's spiritual life. However I will be using a much broader approach to the concept of 'Religion'.

First of all, I would say that religion is an exercise(s) or practice(s) of a spiritual nature. Religion is also an institution of governance of the relationship(s) between a body of believers and their God(s) or gods, based around a common set of beliefs. This governance usually has overlapping spheres of influence into interpersonal relationships of the religious community and its members with the surrounding greater community, family, and business relationships. Thus religion is the infrastructure or guide for the life of a believing community. We can almost go so far as to state that Religion is the framework for the interactions at all levels of both the corporate and personal lives of a believer. The only consistent exception I can think of to this definition of religion is the practice of Atheism. Atheists do have a consistent belief system, but its beliefs about God have nothing to do with their morality or ethics.

Therefore religion in essence, is a belief system of some structure and form relating what that group worships, serves, or is enslaved to; whether that religion is Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Consumerism, Atheism or Deism or anything else.

My second question is, 'Is religion of significance to the world today?' The answer would have to be a strong affirmative, but qualified by my definition in the preceding paragraphs. Based upon that, all forms of worship or idolatry fall into the category of religion. Therefore all or almost all people in the world today practice some form of religion. Be it of the group of more traditional religions of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam or the modern counterparts of humanism, Atheism, deism and more prevalent Consumerism. The forms that these religions take are as diverse as you can imagine, and many who practice these 'religions' would not consider themselves a part of a one, or a religious community but this does not change the fact that they are. Three groups whom I believe would have the biggest problem with this title are atheists and those who practice consumerism and Marxism with overlap into the other traditional religions. A Christian can worship at the altar of consumerism, and through lack of knowledge or choice, also worship at the throne of deism. Thus a person can practice more than one religion at the same time. This said, it would be very easy to lapse into the study of all the "ism's" in the modern world that are forms of religion and especially the "ism" of denominationalism within the Christian church. However, I must return to the original focus of this paper.

Turning our attention to the Old Testament or Hebrew scriptures, I must first state that I have a great appreciation and a very deep respect for the Hebrew scriptures and all that they encompass. Unlike most holy books, or scriptures and even a lot of non-biblical historical texts, the Old Testament presents a very balanced view of everything that is Jewish. The Old Testament tells of both the bad and the good, and it is full of the mistakes, errors and out right rebellion of the Jewish people. A very good example of this is King David. For he has been called "a man after God's own heart"(1 Samuel 13:14) David wrote more psalms than anyone else, and loved God so much that on more than one occasion he spared Saul's life, even though Saul was trying to kill him. David also made very bad decisions; one being having an affair with a woman named Bathsheba, after which having her husband killed. Another great error was the calling of a census on the people, thus breaking one of God's commands and placing a curse over the nation of Israel.

From this example we see that the Hebrew scriptures do present both the good and the bad; the victories and the defeats, the periods of obedience and more frequently and/or in greater duration, the periods of wandering and disobedience. Some of those documents are more biased than another (for example again with David); the author of Chronicles states "the devil" made David sin with Bathsheba, where the author of Samuel clearly lays the blame on David. As the author of Ecclesiasties states, "There is nothing new under the sun" (Ecc. 1:14 paraphrased). Many of the problems in the Hebrew Scriptures, things that always have negative consequences, are still causing problems in the world today. Problems such as adultery, premarital sex, abuse of alcohol, double mindedness, pride, greed, lust and idle worship, are all ones that we have stories about in the Old testament. Each one of these is currently reeking havoc in our lives, our communities and even our nations, to the extent of being global problems, whether we acknowledge them or not. There is a distinction here between accepting the Hebrew Scriptures authority and relevance. They can be relevant without accepting their authority.

The collection of books that make up the Old Testament are real, vital and very raw in parts and are what makes them so applicable to today's world. This is also why I keep finding myself drawn back to them again and again. Therefore I would restate that the Hebrew Scriptures do have a lot of relevance to our world today whether they are accepted or applied to people's lives, or not. I would go so far as to say that if the whole world were to read these scriptures, they would recognize the consequences of the sins in their lives and the lives of those around them. It would lead to changed lives. People would take more seriously their actions and the effects that they create; like ripples from a pebble thrown into a quiet pond.

Therefore the Hebrew scriptures can show us where we as individuals, as communities, as well as a society as a whole, have gone astray. Will provide solutions to these problems if we give up the false religions and return to true worship as outlined in the Old and New Testament. If like Jeremiah prophecies "the law will be written on their hearts" (Jer. 31:33) not a law written on stone, then the world will be transformed.

From these stories we can see where our actions are leading us, like the Nations of Israel and Judah into the wilderness, into the exile and destruction. But like them, we have the promise of restitution and the return from exile, if we are willing to yield our wills and ourselves to God and to His guidance from the Old Testament.

(First Written for RS100E Old Testament Summer 2000.)

Monday, 3 March 2008

George Pal's War of the World - A Film Criticism

Title: The War of the Worlds
Year: 1953

Director: Byron Haskin
Writer:
H.G. Wells (novel), Barré Lyndon (screenplay)

Studio: Paramount Pictures
F
ilm Stock: Color (Technicolor)

Run Time: 85 min.


George Pal's The War of the Worlds was a film that brought terror, from the hearts of people living in a post World War II era, onto the big screen in such a way that it has been reported that people fled from the film screaming. That terror was an experience that would stay with the movie viewers, and is one of the
reasons the film is a cult classic today. How was that terror created? What was its purpose? In this essay we will examine the creation, use and purpose of terror in The War of the Worlds and how religion was used to both create and then help dispel that fear.

First Jesuit writers and media specialists John Pungente and Monty Williams wrote that viewing a film was a liturgical act; they state: "So when we watch a film, what we feel depends on our basic commitment. The film shows us who we are. This is a profoundly spiritual act, but going to a movie is also a liturgical act. Going to the cinema is public prayer; watching a DVD or video with friends or alone can be communal or private prayer. That prayer is an encounter with an "otherness" that helps us define ourselves." The opening sequence of this film, consisting of real news footage and film clips, from World War II and nuclear testing, though only 40 seconds in length would have put a 1953 audience on edge. The viewers have come to be entertained and are reminded of the horrors that the world has just gone through. Now the viewers are intimately connected to the film and to the people on screen. The first large group shot on screen is centered on Rev. Dr. Matthew Collins. The reverend would be recognizable by every viewer in the United States in 1953, and most would associate him with their pastor. So when he approaches the aliens in faith praying, trying to make contact, they would be associating Matthew's actions with the actions of their own priest, pastor or minister. The screen shot of Rev. Matthew praying, with his Bible raised, in words almost all Americans in 1953 would have recognized as Psalm 23, is essential to the religious tones in the film. Then, when he is killed by the aliens, the audience would have been devastated. How could they not be!

The terror is
created in many ways in this film. First aliens land and attack without provocation. Second is Reverend Matthew's death, described above. Third all of man's defenses are for naught. Our weapons, our science, our military strength cannot even dent the alien machines, let alone stop them. The scientists, who had the equipment that might be able to help, have been hijacked by a mob; they have no equipment, and are scattered. All hope seems to be lost. However, faith comes back into the film. Yet there is the lingering question of the scientists, if their convoy had not been attacked by the mob could they have found the answer? Could science have solved this problem if they had the resources and the time. The film hits at the fact that the alien blood sample could lead to a scientific solution. It is a question that lingers and leaves us seeking a scientific solution, man relying upon his intellect.

Then later after science has failed, Dr. Clayton Forrester, who is in search of Sylvia, begins looking in churches. As he journeys through three churches, we see different denominations and their reaction to this calamity. We pass from an Episcopal, to a Catholic, to an Evangelical church, where he does find Sylvia. This is the only church physically attacked by the aliens and the aliens die just as they do so.

At the time of this film, religion was a mainstay in the American home, and central to the American family life. The film ends with words "God in his divine wisdom…" and all is well on earth again. The film can be seen as an attempt to find balance between religion and science, particularly in an age when the Roman Catholic Church was still very against the scientific method and scientific revolution; that was a large part of modernity. This film sets science and religion on parity, the two pillars of the country.

The film used terror to drive people back to the church and to trust in science. It does so in a few specific ways. First it tries to put religion and science on an equal footing presenting them as parallel pillars to American life and society. This is done through the introduction of characters like Rev. Matthew and Dr. Forrester. It is also done through the filming of shots and Sylvia's progression as a mediator between the religious and scientific elements in the film. Dr. Cowan states: "Screenwriter Barré Lyndon completely reversed the understanding of religion in Wells' novel, and used it instead to reinforce the intimate connection that existed in post- World War Two America between strong faith and a determined resistance to communist aggression." The film used terror to draw people back to religion, to foster a trust in science, and to be used as a tool to help motivate the American people in facing the 'alien' threat of communism.

Endnotes:

  1. Cowan, Douglas E. - Lecture September 10th 2007 Renison College
  2. Williams, Monte SJ & Pungente, John SJ Finding God in the Dark, Novalis, Toronto, 2004 p.17
  3. Cowan, Douglas E. (2007) Course Lecture RS 266, Renison College
  4. Cowan, Douglas E, "Intellects Vast and Cool and Unsympathetic: Religion, Science and The War of the Worlds." Forthcoming. (Course Notes Page 17)
Bibliography

Cowan, Douglas E,
"Intellects Vast and Cool and Unsympathetic:
Religion, Science and The War of the Worlds."
Forthcoming.

Pungente, John SJ Finding
God in the Dark
& Williams, Monty Novalis, Toronto, 2004

Pope Pius XII Apostolic Exhortations to
Representatives of the Cinema
Vatican, 21st June 1955

http://imdb.com
http://vatican.ca

(First Written for RS266 Religion in Popular Film Fall 2007.)

Saturday, 1 March 2008

The War of the Ring, a Study in Good and Evil in Tolkien's Lord of the Rngs

The War of the Ring, a Study in Good and Evil.

Tolkien's epic The Lord of the Rings according to authorial witness is an attempt to "Try his hand at really long story that would hold the attention of readers, amuse, them delight them, and at times maybe excite them or deeply move them". He further insists that it was not his intention to create an allegory. Rather, he prefers, "history, true or feigned with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers." This applicability to the reader involves the ultimate cosmic struggle between Good and Evil. Although the battle is universal in focus, it is fought in specific locales and by concrete individuals. Thus a discussion of good and evil in The Lord of the Rings must involve the influence of place and the character qualities of individuals. Since people are not abstract ideas as are Good and Evil, it is not surprising that as they make moral decisions there is a blurring of the categories which produces areas of grey on the black and white spectrum of Good and Evil. This is appropriate for if this 'feigned' history is representative of the good and evil in our world it should represent the complicated nature of the struggle and its many nuances comparisons between the two. First places of inherent good, or evil, secondly people who are either good or evil, and thirdly those area's or people who are grey, neither black or white, good or evil, and their contributions to the development of the story and adventure.

Good shall be defined as morally excellent, virtuous, right proper, reliable, kind and benevolent. While Evil shall be defined as, harmful, morally wicked, offensive, injurious and dangerous. White is that which is innocent and untainted. The definitions of good and evil are too limiting to really use as a guide for the analysis for the books. Therefore I will attempt to do some justice to this work, by adding distinctions or nuances into the spectrum of Good and Evil. If good may be symbolized by white and evil by black then there are multiple shades of grey that describe the vast number of people and places in the novels. Finally grey is that which shares qualities of both black and white, but are not completely in either category.

Central to the story and to the conflict between good and evil is 'The One Ring'. It is an object yet it exerts a will and a force, much of Sauron's will and desire for domination went into the forging of the ring. The ring is inherently evil it is a living entity, as if it were an individual with an independent will. It is capricious and seeks conflict and power. As such it is really the driving force in the book, either for evil to obtain it, or for the forces of the west to see it destroyed. " 'You will hear today all that you need in order to understand the purpose of the Enemy. There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it. But you do not stand alone. You will learn that your trouble is but part of the trouble of all the western world. The Ring! What shall we do with the Ring, the least of rings, the trifle that Sauron Fancies? That is the doom we must deem.' " This quote shows us that at the 'Council of Elrond' the decision by those of the west as to what to do with the ring will have implications on all people of Middle-Earth. They have little hope of success, for the ring and Sauron are both very strong, but they must face the possible doom of failure, to achieve the only possible success, the destruction of the ring. Here at the beginning of the discussion on what is to be done, we receive the hints that the Ring is the key to all, to success or failure. Elrond goes on to say "'we cannot use the Ruling Ring. That we know too well. It belongs to Sauron and was made by him alone, and is altogether evil,".

This book is in part a journey through place, and place plays a very important role in
this work. Now an attempt to examine some of the places in the story and how they are perceived as either good, or evil. First an encounter with places that are good; Tom Bombadil's House, Rivendell, Lothlorien, The Healing Houses, Fangorn Forrest and Henneth Annun. Then on to Evil Places: The Black Gate, Cirith Ungol, Mount Doom, Minas Morgul Cirith Gorgor, Torech Ungol, Mordor, Dwimorberg. Finally places that are Grey: The Shire, Rohan, Isengard, Minas Tirith, Gondor, Mirkwood Forrest (Note: From our text alone Mirkwood would be consider a place of evil, yet Gandolf makes reference to it being re-cleansed and re-inhabited by men, while discussing events at 'The prancing pony' in the chapter 'Homeward Bound".), Bree. This list though not exhaustive is sufficient for illustrative purposes.

For our definitions of good and evil for place must vary somewhat from those used in
the discussion of people. A good place is a place of inherent good, either in or of itself, or because of some force or power at work there, it is a place of refreshing, renewal or restitution. The first example is that of Rivendell. "Frodo was now safe in the Last Homely House east of the Sea. That house was, as Bilbo had long ago reported, 'a perfect house, whether you liked food or sleep, or story-telling or singing, or just sitting and thinking best, or a pleasant mixture of them all'. Merely to be there was a cure for weariness, fear and sadness." Rivendell is almost an island of the idyllic, or a heaven like place. It is the one of two places' other than the shire that really grabs at the hearts of the Hobbits and one that their minds keep returning to when times get hard for them on the road. Another place for examination of a true place of good is Lothlorien, "Said Legolas, 'but we hear that Lorien is not yet deserted, for there is a secret power here that holds evil from the land.'" Here again we have a place that is good, in part because of the inhabitants and also because of a power over it. This too is a place where our travelers rest, and are restored before beginning their journey again.

There are some places, locations or geographic regions in the book that appear to be evil in and of
them selves. In this story there are a few places that are recognised by those in the story as evil, black and wicked, they are so in part because of who dwells there. Yet also because of what they are; we see this most clearly in that after Sauron is destroyed and Evil as a force defeated Aragorn states "'For,' said he 'Minas Ithil in Morgul Vale shall be utterly destroyed, and though it may in time to come be made clean, no man may dwell there for many long years.'" So a place may remain evil after Evil presence is removed. Shelob's lair is the first of the truly evil places to be examined: "so they both lived, delighting in their own devices, and feared no assault, nor wrath, nor any end of their wickedness. Never yet had any fly escaped from Shelob's web's, and the greater now was her rage and hunger" Shelob's lair was a place of evil, death and destruction, and one that was encouraged by Sauron, he even used it for his own purposes. "And as for Sauron: He knew where she lurked. It pleased him that she should dwell there hungry but unabated in malice, a more sure watch upon that ancient path into his land than any other that his skill could have devised. And Orcs, they were useful slaves, but he had them in plenty. If now and again Shelob caught them to stay her appetite, she was welcome: he could spare them. And sometimes as a man may cast a dainty to his cat (his cat he calls her, but she owns him not) Sauron would send her prisoners that he had not better uses for: he would have them driven to her hole, and report brought back to him of the play she made."

The second place of evil I would like to look at is Mount Doom; this is the place where much of our stru
ggle between good and evil originates. It is the place of Dark power and the forging of the 'One Ring'. This centre of evil is destroyed with the destruction of the ring, thus proving a link between evil and this place. So after this examination of places that are good, and places that are evil, now the discussion will proceed to some places that are Grey and the reasons for this third category.

An exploration of places that are grey shall begin with Isengard. A place that is
neither evil nor good, it is a place of power centred in Orthanc. This location that was developed and abused by Saruman, who wished to compete with Mordor and with Sauron for control of middle-earth used it for much evil. After Saruman's abandonment of Isengard it is locked and the key given to Aragorn. However this started as a place of good, a place of learning and was the seat of the Council of wizards. This place should not be considered evil just because it was turned to such use. Unlike Minas Ithil, which is to be destroyed and no stones left upon each other after the defeat of the evil there, Isengard is to be redeemed, and recovered and used by Gondor again.

Another grey place to be considered is 'the shire'. Many who read The Lord of the
Rings often associate good or evil with the character of people who are predominant in a place. But this is an oversimplification. For in reality the Shire was much like a nursery for children. It was watched over and protected by the Rangers and Gandolf for generations. Thus the inhabitants for the most part ignored the outside world, and were ignored or protected from the outside world. I would not confuse that ignorance or innocence if you wish to call it that as being Good. Therefore I must say that the shire is grey, it is neither inherently good, nor inherently evil. . The story begins and ends in "the Shire", the home of the Hobbits, this place little known beyond its borders or it's people, a place of protected innocence. Then at the end of the story the over protection of the Shire and the Hobbits is lifted. Therefore they will have to determine anew an independent morality and there role in the realm of Middle-Earth. This is an area of Grey; it is far better than some area's our adventures journey through, but it still has its problems.

To conclude although there are a few places that are either black or white, these are more the exception than the norm, there are more places that are morally grey. That there are so many places that are some shade of grey is much like our own world. Tolkien in 'On Fairy Story' states, "The primary World, Reality, of elves and men is the same, if differently valued and perceived." Therefore I would say that Middle-Earth as a representation of a prehistory of our world, Has more places of Good and Evil, and fewer areas of grey than we have today. The world today has become far more grey and sometimes it is even hard to distinguish if a place leans towards black or white on the scale of grey. If Tolkien indicates the true realm of fantasy is but one of a different perception of our world, then our encounter of Middle-Earth should help us to revamp or change our perception of our world and view of reality.

The discussion of good and evil can now proceed to look at some of the cast of characters. To begin the focus shall be on the inherently good people, by that we mean people who seek the best for others and risk themselves in order to pursue that end: Treebeard, Sam, Peregrin, Meriadoc, Faramir, Eowyn/DernHelm. Evil people are defined as those who work to further the cause of evil, pursue power for dominion over others, are harmful and morally wicked: Sauron, Wormtongue and Shelob. Finally those who are Grey in nature, exhibit qualities of either good or evil, or pursue a good end with an ulterior motive or through manipulation and control with out the end goal of individual power: Gandolf, Aragorn, Saruman and Gollum. Again these lists are in now way complete but just a sampling for some examples to be drawn upon.
The examination of good characters starts with Sam as the best example of a good person. Sam may be a little simple, but he is very loyal, caring and self-sacrificing throughout the adventure. Sam grows in character more than any of our adventurers through out the story. "But even as hope died in Sam, or seemed to die, it was turned to a new strength. Sam's plain hobbit-face grew stern, almost grim, as the will hardened in him, and he felt through all his limbs a thrill, as if he was turning into some creature of stone and steel that neither despair nor weariness nor endless barren miles could subdue. Sam has reached the end or strength and hope appears to be lost, and here he is re-fortified and re-strengthened by some inner transformation. Sam is in my opinion one of the very few truly altruistic and truly good characters.

Another example of goodness is found in Faramir. He shows great character in two instances in the same chapter. The first example of his benevolence he gives Gollum his life, based on Frodo's protection. The second, even though contrary to his father's command, he determines the validity and urgency of Frodo's and company's journey. Rather then delaying them, he blesses them and sends them on their journey, even though it may cost him much in his own home. "'Then I will declare my doom,' said Faramir. 'As for you Frodo, in so far as lies in me under higher authority, I declare you free in the realm of Gondor to the furthest of its ancient bounds; save only that neither you nor any that go with you have leave to come to this place unbidden. … In the meantime, whomsoever you take under your protection shall be under my protection and under the shield of Gondor.'" Faramir is willing to risk his own rights and reputation in order to do what he feels is good and right.

Now to look at some characters that are evil, we will look at two such creatures, Sauron, and Shelob. These two are chosen since they are the prominent Evil characters in the trilogy. This has been previously illustrated in the discussion of Shelob's Lair. Although Sauron is not encountered directly the testimony of his influence pervades the novels. Yet we never actually encounter him directly. Yet he is the greatest character of evil we have in the book, and his evil is linked to that of the ring for he poured so much of himself into the ring. Thus the ring and Sauron are intimately linked, both are a dark force and both exude influence over others and both seek control.

The second character of evil to be look at is that of Shelob: "There age long she had dwelt, an evil thing in spider-form, even such as once of old had lived in the land of the Elves of the west that is now under the Sea, … How Shelob came there, flying from ruin, no tales tell, for out of the dark years few tales have come." Thus we see Shelob as a thing of evil, and evil from of old before memory or history. It is not an accident that these two dwell next to each other and are of mutual benefit of each other.
There are some characters however, that are neither completely good nor evil but rather somewhere in between. An examination of these grey characters will include reasons for such classification. To begin with a character who is morally grey, Aragorn; though he attempts much, and also risks much. He does all of this with a view of the impending self rewards. If he succeeds he will become King of Gondor, and also be able to marry the women he loves Arwen. " 'But this is madness,' she said. 'For here are men of renown and prowess, whom you should not take into shadows, but should lead to war, where men are needed. I beg you to remain and ride with my brother; for then all our hearts will be gladdened, and our hope be the brighter.'
'It is not madness, lady.' He answered; 'for I go on the path appointed. … But I shall take the Paths of the Dead, alone, if needs be." Because of these mixed or ulterior motives he cannot be classified as entirely good, even though his actions lead to good results.


Another example in this category is that or Saruman, although apparently evil and admittedly on the darker side of the spectrum his morality is mitigated by the testimony of Gandolf. If Saruman is judged by his actions as described in this history it would be hard to see him as anything but evil. Yet Gandolf remembers a time when Saruman was not as he is now. Perhaps that is why he is known still as Saruman the White. Gandolf muses, "I will do nothing to him. I do not wish for mastery. What will become of him? I cannot say. I grieve that so much that was good now festers in the tower." Unlike something that is intrinsically evil Saruman is corrupted and for this reason the benefit of the doubt will be granted to him and he will be perceived as an individual who is very dark grey.

The battle concerning the ring is a struggle for good and evil yet it is more than just a clear cut two sided battle. There are people and places that are caught somewhere between the two in this conflict. Too often in life and in story the areas of grey far outweigh those of black and white. I would state that, that this is true of The Lord of the Rings as well. There is an epic battle between Good and Evil, yet there are many in our cast of characters who are neither wholly good, nor wholly evil. The theme of good and evil dominates the work but there are nuances in Tolkien's story as it
unfolds. It is the classic struggle between good and evil, yet those who are truly good and those who are truly evil are few. The evil that dominates this story is 'what is to become of the ring' and 'will the quest to destroy the ring succeed.' If so then good will triumph over evil. Therefore we have a story that is the battle between good and evil, light and darkness, but it is more complex than it appears. This is appropriate for the question of morality both in this fantasy world and the real world involves more than simplistic bimodal thinking. Readers are drawn to this story since it reflects their world and the fantasy aspect leaves the hope that good will triumph over evil in our world too.

Endnotes

  1. J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, Great Britain: George Allan & Unwin Ltd., 1973. p. 8 (All further references to this book, will be LOTR and Page Number.)
  2. LOTR p. 9
  3. J.R.R. Tolkien "The Fellowship of the Ring", In The Lord of the Rings, Great Britain: George Allan & Unwin Ltd., 1973. p. 259 (All further references to this book, will be FOR and Page Number.)
  4. FOR p. 284
  5. From our text alone Mirkwood would be consider a place of evil, yet Gandolf makes reference to it being re-cleansed and re-inhabited by men, while discussing events at 'The prancing pony' in the chapter 'Homeward Bound".
  6. FOR p. 241
  7. FOR p.356
  8. J.R.R. Tolkien, 'The Return Of The King', In The Lord of the Rings, Great Britain: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1973. p. 1004 (All further reference to this book will be ROTK, and Page Number.)
  9. J.R.R. Tolkien, "The Two Towers", In The Lord of the Rings, Great Britain: George Allan & Unwin Ltd., 1973. p. 751 (All further references to this book, will be TT and page Number.)
  10. TT p. 751
  11. J.R.R. Tolkien, 'On Fairy Story', In Tree and Leaf, London: Harper Collins, 2001. p. 52
  12. It must be noted that some of these characters would be in different list if we just looked at them from the episodes in these books. However since many inferences are made to either previous events or future events we must accept that a person's character is not limited to the specific events of this work.
  13. ROTK p. 969
  14. TT p. 717
  15. TT p. 750
  16. ROTK p. 815
  17. TT p. 608
Bibliography

J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, Great Britain:
George Allan & Unwin Ltd., 1973.

J.R.R. Tolkien, 'On Fairy Story', In Tree and Leaf, London:
Harper Collins, 2001.

(First Written for ENGL208A Forms of Fantasy Sping 2001)

Friday, 29 February 2008

Inner Geek - Validated February 2008

As I wrote about here, I am currently working on a series of computer certifications. I will add logo's each month or so to show my progress and update you my readers. They are order from most recently earned to the oldest. I have also added at the bottom a list of the names of exams passed to achieve these designation. These exams are a mix of CompTIA exams and Microsoft Exams.



Earlier I also wrote about having an inner geek, and working on some certifications, specifically the Microsoft Office Specialist, and about playing with multi OS's. Well that combined with some recent schooling has produced a score of computer certifications. Above are the different logo's representing the specific certifications. The Logo's are in the reverse order that I earned the right to use them. And This post will outline the schedule of certifications I plan to write over the next year and a bit.

Here's My setup at work, IBM- Lenovo T61 Docking Station and 2 Viewsonic VA1926W 19InchW monitors.

At home, Tower, and 2 Acer AL2223W monitors:
Notice the way cool C64 Commodore Monitor still in use in the left corner.
You can see my new den here.


Exams Written:


MCTS Deploying & Maintaining Vista Client Office System - Exam 070-624
MCITP Desktop Support Consumer Support - 070-623
CompTIA Network+ 2007 - JK0-012 JK0-010
MCTS Windows Vista Client Configuaration - Exam 072-622 070-622
MCITP Desktop Support - Exam 072-622 070-622
CompTIA A+ Depot Technician - Exam 220-602
CompTIA A+ Remote Support Technician - Exam 220-603

CompTIA A+ IT Technician - Exam JK0-601 220-602
CompTIA A+ Essentials - Exam JK0-601

Microsoft PowerPoint - Exam 810
Microsoft Outlook - Exam 813
Microsoft Access - Exam 807
Microsoft Excel - Exam 804
Microsoft Word - Exam 801


These exams were written either at a Prometric Testing Center or at a Certiport Testing Center for the Office exams. The Exams names that have links link to reviews of the books I used to prepare for those exams.


Wednesday, 27 February 2008

Paul and Community

Paul and Community
A sampling of views and opinions on
Paul and His work as community Builder.

In pursuing my studies of Paul, and Pauline theology, I have come to appreciate and understand many themes and issues worthy of discussion and further inquiry. Yet the one that grabbed at my heart and mind to
me for further attention was that of 'Paul and community'. It is of particular concern for me, as the struggles around the meaning of 'community' and the process of building and maintaining 'community' within the Body of Christ are of as much import today as in Paul's day. Since many of his letters are addressed to congregations, nay I say communities he founded and helped shape, yet the same struggles and problems are evident in today's Church thus today's church communities. So I believe that Paul's endeavors to create community, and to sustain it after his leaving are worthy of consideration.

I owe much of my process along this path to Ben Witherington III, and his book The Paul Quest. Which spurred me in this direction. Witherington states in his book "Paul is a community-oriented person who values community preservation over personal privilege." Thus for Paul the community of believers was to come first and foremost. Witherington also states "he (Paul) gained his primary sense of identity not from his physical family but from his Christian family and his relationship with Christ." Thus we see a man who not only put community first, but also gained his own purpose and drive from that community and those relationships. But many questions beg to be asked:
  • Why this focus on community?
  • What sort of community?
  • How is community expressed?
  • How did Paul create community?
From these questions we have a springboard from which to approach the study of Paul and community. However I must state that this list is in no way comprehensive in regards to this topic, but they will lead us on a journey to deeper understanding, and even more questions for further perusal.

The question of why such a focus on community is a good place for us to start. From our previous study on Paul, we must ask why would a Jewish Pharisee begin
witnessing to Gentiles about a Jewish messiah. The answer is in Paul's experience on the Damascus road and the changes that lead to in his heart, mind and spirit. As can be seen from Paul's Superscripto from 2nd Corinthians 1:1 "Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God,…, to the church of God which is at Corinth." Paul sees himself as an apostle and as being called and sent by God. Again Paul Clearly outlines his self view in Galatians1:11-16 "For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, now was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ. For you have heard of my former manner of life in Judaism, how I used to persecute the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it; and I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries among my countrymen, being more extremely zealous for my ancestral traditions. But when God, who had set me apart even from my mother's womb and called me through His grace, was pleased to reveal His Son in me so that I might preach Him among the Gentiles."

Here we see a man who used to live in one community, who is now reaching out beyond those boundaries to create a new community that crosses ethnocentric, and religious boundaries. Paul believed he had a call to preach, and his preaching was interwoven with community building. I would go so far as to state that for Paul you could not have Christ followers without having community. Robert Banks also echoes this idea in his book, Paul's idea of Community; he states, "To embrace the gospel, then, is to enter into community. A person cannot have one without the other." Yet this interlinking of the two was deliberate. Banks also states: "In the wake of Paul's travels throughout the Mediterranean, Christian communities sprang up, consolidated and began to multiply. This was the outcome of a deliberate policy on his part. He not only proclaimed the message about Christ and brought people into an intimate relationship with God, but he also explained the consequences of that message for the life of his converts and led them into a personal relationship with one another." Therefore Paul has no choice but to have a focus on community. For that community is interlinked and inseparable from the message of Salvation, which is through Jesus Christ. Now those communities were not perfect and they had problems, much like the Church and churches today still have problems and struggles. This could also then lead us to the question; why is there not clearer instructions on this concept of community in Paul's writings, but that will have to await further studies.

Now that we see that Paul's focus on community was a direct result of his understanding of his call, and the Gospel he preached we must now move onto the question of 'What sort of Community?'

The question of 'what sort' of community is much harder to answer than that of why the focus on community. From my course notes for RS209 May 13th 1998 there are 5 distinct advantages to house Churches, and thus early Christian communities:


1. Distinctively Christian Worship.

2. Some members had high social status (Providing the house).
3. Made intelligible the attention Paul makes to Families.
4. Training of early Christians.
5. At least one person in the community had to have a house in the town, thus there could be a safe environment for the Christians to meet in.


Yet even with this understanding of requirements and advantages of Christian Communities, there are many unanswered issues. Abraham Malherbe in his book, Social Aspects of Early Christians, states: "The current interest in the social aspects of early Christian communities has called for attention to be focused on the communities formed by Christians. Several difficulties, however, confront us in our attempts to describe their constitution from within." However Malherbe's recognition of the difficulties, and my own hesitation should not stop us from wrestling with this vital question. Paul himself has much to say on this topic. First Paul has a desires for there to be unity in the church is clearly seen in from Philippians 2:2 he states, "make my joy complete by being of the same mind, maintaining the same love, united in spirit, intent on one purpose". Paul also goes on to state that he is responsible to preach to many people groups for in Romans 1:14 he says: "I am under obligation both to Greeks and to barbarians, both to wise and foolish." And in verse 16 "For I am not ashamed of this Good News about Christ. It is the power of God at work, saving everyone who believes - Jews first and also gentiles." Thus we see his belief that this community can encompass all people groups, Jews, Greeks and barbarians. Paul also clearly states that his teachings are for all churches he has been involved with, that Christian doctrine should be universal in application, in 1st Corinthians 4:17 outlines this: "For this reason I have sent to you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, and he will remind you of my ways which are in Christ, just as I teach everywhere in every church." Here we see a concern on Paul's part for those he has taught, that they continue to grow and learn and practice what he has taught them. Paul also has great concern that the communities continue to live the truth, for in Galatians 1:6,7 Paul clearly states there is but one Gospel, and is concerned that the church in Galatia is turning from it. "I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ." So therefore from the above argument, if the gospel and community were interrelated realities, the perversion of the one would also be a perversion of the other. Thus if the Galatians turn from the true gospel, they also turn from true community.

Since from this small sampling we see that Paul had great concern for the Christian community, and for the individual churches within that larger community. Witherington states, "Paul clearly believed that "in-house" and "In community" Christianity could make a difference in the first Cent
ury world. … Living as a new community, a model of how the new creation changes things, Christians bore good witness to a new worldview." Therefore the community's lifestyle was not just for their own sake but also for the sake of witness. Wayne Meeks makes some very interesting observations; I would like to share two of them here: "And we see both family code and city code crossed by the claims of new loyalties; an empire on the one hand, on the other a new cult that uses at once language of city, family, and empire and challenges all three." And secondly, "They have detached themselves from those ties of place and of family which, in a rural culture, ordinarily determine a person's identity." Therefore we see that this new community challenged all contemporary cultural rules and settings. Thus Paul was not changing the social aspect of society, he was changing the family and community to a new one. It called for one to realign one's loyalties to a new setting, to a Christ Jesus, and through him to his body the church. "For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office: So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another." Here Paul clearly ties together the binding of Christians one to another through there unity. Which will lead us into our next question.

How is Christian community expressed? We see that the Christian Community is a body as cited in Romans above, therefore, Christians are parts of a body. The body of Christ, and that this body will have unity. That this community takes place on many levels: the individual house church, the city wide or regional church, and the corporate "C"hurch. Meeks describes it this way: "The church in each city thus typically consisted of a number of small cells meeting in various private houses. Where the Christians were lucky enough to have find a convert or sympathizer who could afford a more spacious house, all the cells in a city might come together on occasion for worship and instruction." Meeks in another work of his The First Urban Christians, states clearly that the individual churches knew they belonged to a larger reality. "The Local groups of Christians not only enjoyed a high level of cohesion and group identity, they were also made aware that they belonged to a larger movement." This is also seen when Paul is making collections for those in Jerusalem who are suffering. The different churches respond to funding the work of God.

However Witherington makes too very good points: "Literacy as a criterion for Christian leadership in the early church is a factor too seldom considered." And also, "but I support E. A. Judge's conclusions that early Christianity was led and largely supported by an elite minority who were of the higher social strata." Which when brought together indicates that for Witherington the early church leaders were very probably those who were learned and of some social standing. Thus the earliest Christians created the 'codex' system, for easier production and dissemination of there writings. Which when studied in conjunction with the questions of " what sort" of community, even more broadly spans the social strata. The early communities were also to be a people set apart, a people for God. In 1st Thessalonians 4:7,9,10 Paul's states: "For God has not called us for the purpose of impurity, but in sanctification. … Now as to the love of the brethren, you have no need for any one to write to you, for you yourselves are taught by God to love one another; for indeed you do practice it towards all the brethren who are in all Macedonia. But we urge you, brethren, to excel still more." Here we see Paul thanking a congregation for their concern for other believers, but still challenging them on to more.

Thus we see community expressed through love and good deeds. Through care and commitment, we also see it expressed through Paul's
continuing concern for the community even when he is not present in person. We see community or at least Christian community as one that attempts to break down the old allegiances, to family, city, state, and have a new commitment to other believers no matter there status, or origins. We see a community that was deliberately fostered and challenged to growth in love and good deeds.

Finally then we are lead to our query, how did Paul create community? Of the four questions being tackled in this essay, I believe this is the most difficult. For it requires the most conjecture. However that being stated it is inferred from Paul's words and actions that he did create community, and communities. This was done through a number of methods used either separately or in conjunction. The first is through personal presence and teaching. Paul spent time with these communities in person. He would teach, preach, admonish and challenge them to faith in Jesus Christ then though that to fellowship with one another. After he moved on to another town, he stayed in contact with the previous community(s), through letters, reports from co-workers, through prayer for them and an expectation of prayer and support from them. Paul deliberately found some with means (those with money) in each community who could then host the church and churches activities. But he also went out into the markets, streets and highways to preach and teach to anyone who would listen. He worked hard to cross cultural barriers, and social economic barriers; he would invite anybody into the kingdom, and expect the church to welcome all who came in the name of Christ Jesus. It reminds me of a story I heard a few years back, "This young man a university student became a Christian through outreach on campus. The following Sunday he heads to the nearest church. He comes in and is wearing torn jeans and a t-shirt, and sandals. He arrives a little late and the pews appear to be full. Walking down to the front he does not find a seat open, so he sits on the floor near the front of the church. Now by now people are whispering and coughing. Then an usher comes forward, an elderly man, wearing a 3-piece suit, walking with a cane. It is heard, said 'Bill will straighten him, out, he doesn't belong here, look no suit. …' And other such remarks. The old usher gets up front and rather than rebuking the young man, he slowly and gingerly lowers himself to the floor and sits beside the young man. At this point the pastor gets up, and says 'what I was about to say you would never remember, what we just witnessed you will never forget.'" That is the type of community Paul was working to build, one where love and care came first.

Thus I must state that even though I looked at four different questions, through this work I have found that the four are very closely interrelated. What answers one, can then be reapplied to the next, or to the previous. I think it important at this point to reiterate that Paul did have a focus on a ne
w community that was the family of God. That this focus leads to a clear understanding of community and roles and responsibilities within that community. Paul deliberately was an architect of building community and community that crossed all barriers, Jews, Greeks, and barbarians, poor and rich, slave and freeman, male and female. That was universal and strived to live the best of both Judaism and Roman culture. For Paul community was integral to being a Christ follower, just as it should be for us today.
(St Paul Preaching.)

Endnotes

  1. The Paul Quest, p.181
  2. The Paul Quest, P.18
  3. NASB, 2nd Cor 1:1, P. 827
  4. NRSV, Gal 1:11-16a
  5. Paul's Idea of Community, p.27
  6. Paul's Idea of Community, p.26
  7. Social Aspects of Early Christians, p.60
  8. NASB, Philippians 2:2, p.842
  9. NASB, Romans 1:14, p.807
  10. NLT, Romans 1:16, p. 961
  11. NRSV, 1 Cor 4:17, p.1667
  12. NKJV, Galatians 1:6,7 p. 1278
  13. The Paul Quest, p.201,202
  14. The Moral World of the First Christians, p. 23
  15. The Moral World of the First Christians, p. 104
  16. KJV, Romans 12:4,5 www.biblegateway.com
  17. The Moral World of the First Christians, p. 110
  18. The First Urban Christians, p.107
  19. The Paul Quest, P.92
  20. The Paul Quest, P.93
  21. NASB, 1st Thess 4:7,9,10 p. 847
  22. Source unknown a story I heard.

Bibliography

Meeks, Wayne
The Moral World of the first Christians,
SPCK, London: 1987

The First Urban Christians,
Yale University Press, Binghamton, N.Y.: 1983

Banks, Robert
Paul's Idea of Community,
Hendrickson, Peabody: 1998

Malherbe, Abraham J.
Social Aspects of Early Christianity,
Louisiana State University Press, Kingsport: 1977

Witherington III, Ben
The Paul Quest,
IVP, Downers Grove: 1998

Bibles

New King James Version
(Possibility Thinkers Edition)
Thomas Nelson, New York: 1984

New Revised Standard Version
(HarperCollins Study Bible)
Harper Collins, San Francisco: 1997

New American Standard Bible
(Gideons)
RBW Graphics, Canada: 1986

New Living Translation
(New Believers Bible)
Tyndale, Wheaton: 1996

King James Bible
http://www.biblegateway.com

(First Written for RS398 Selected Reading in Paul Winter 2001. Note The links go to specific reviews of those books.)